Friday, June 29, 2012

Kosovo: A Case Study on Meaningful Aid

As we prepared for our departure from Turkey, we had to quickly scramble to change our plans when we learned that for almost a year the train route from Istanbul to Budapest had been discontinued ...We also learned that most bus routes from Istanbul go directly into the former Yugoslovia. So...a day later we found ourselves in Pristina, Kosovo. As generation Y'ers (admittedly a bit naive) our idea of visiting Kosovo was synonymous with heading into an active war zone. The trip began dubiously enough when -  in hot pursuit for bus tickets out of Istanbul, we were guided by a concierge (a concierge at a hotel where we were not actually patrons) to a "Mr. Vebby behind the bus station." Fortunately, after exercising some flexibility, we ended up with tickets for two middle seats on a bus bound for Kosovo. Despite our unfounded assumptions, we quickly learned that this beautiful country is much more than the 1999 war, that  -for us, largely defined it. Although there is still conflict in Kosovo, for the most part the violence has stopped and the conflict is isolated mostly to the northern border with Serbia.  However, the results of the conflict  (persistent poverty and discrimination on both sides) remain.

In one of those strange and useful coincidences, before leaving Istanbul we caught  a report by Al Jazeera entitled "African Aid: Helpful or Hazardous?" The piece focused on businesses like TOMS shoes and organizations that provide clothing donations to Africa. Despite good intentions, a recent study has shown that such donations have lead to a 40% reduction in Africa's clothing production domestically. Additionally, and perhaps more detrimentally, some critics have concluded that such donations (and aid in general) have taken the pressure off the government to remain accountable to its citizens and instead promotes the government and citizens to rely on foreign intervention. To conclude, the report focuses on direct investment and micro credit loans as a more meaningful alternative. For a more in-depth look please check out the full report from Al Jazeera. This report was particularly interesting to us as we entered Kosovo - a country run almost entirely by international aid agencies, governing bodies and foreign military. In fact, 98% of Kosovo's GDP comes from outside aid and remittances. 

In the photos below we highlight one particular organization that moves beyond donations to direct investment in a the community of Fushe Kosove. Families in Fushe Kosove, on average, live on less than 60 Euros a month (less than 9 Euros/Person). Begging and rummaging through trash for scrap metal are the only methods of income outside of social welfare.
The Newborn sign is one of the most recognizable landmarks in the capitol city of Pristina. It was erected after independence was declared in 2008. Residents are encouraged to "make their mark" on the sign...
This train station, lying just outside the village of Fushe Kosove, was used to drive ethnic Albanians out of Kosovo during the "ethnic cleansing" operation by the Serbs in 1999. Although the train station now operates for tourism and domestic travel purposes, it is still largely synonymous with the genocide

Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
Fushe Kosove, Kosovo
This young girl is prohibited from attending public school in Kosovo because of a law that prevents women from wearing veils in school. Unlike the law in France, this law does not prevent all shows of religious affiliation (e.g. crucifix necklaces, yamakas), it only prevents shows of muslim affiliation. Because her family makes less than 60 Euros a month, she cannot afford to attend a private school and currently relies entirely on a small NGO (The Ideas Partnership) to receive an education.




It costs 4 euros for a small trash can to be transported fromthe village of Fushe Kosove to a landfill outside the capitol city of Pristina (only 5km away). Since most residents of Fushe Kosove live on less than 60 Euros a month, most of the trash is deposited in two large landfills in the middle of the village.
In the part of Fushë Kosovë where The Ideas Partnership has been working, the vast majority of earnings come from the women begging and the men going through the city's rubbish bins for re-sellable scrap. Children often have to work with their parents. This basic need for money to get food is one of the reasons that the school enrollment rates have been very low.






A few minutes after we took this picture, this dog was picked up by one of the women in the village and killed. As a huge dog lover and animal rights supporter I was horrified.  I was equally horrified by the survival circumstances that would make a person  think killing this dog was the right thing to do. He actions were not right, but being forced by economic circumstances to live with your children in a landfill, competing with dogs for food, isn't right either.











The Sa-Punë micro-finance soap-making project is one way that women in Fushe Kosove are trying to end the cycle of poverty. All of the women who hand-make these scented olive oil soaps have children who started school this year. With a bit of training, they can see their hard work translating directly into earnings: they're less likely to be out begging and less likely to be taking their children out of school.












In addition to organizing micro credit loan projects and educational opportunities, the Ideas Partnership  takes donations of clothes and shoes to distribute to the families in Fushe Kosove.  There seems to be a distinct difference between the way in which Ideas Partnership distributes donations compared to other such organizations, critiqued by Al Jazeera.  In Kosovo if a child comes to school without proper footwear, clothing, or hygiene, that child is immediately sent home. Since the creation of The Ideas Partnership, families have a place to go to find immediate assistance and get their children back into the classroom. 
 On a personal note, we walked away from the Al Jazeera report wondering: before we donate clothes wouldn't it be wiser  to sell these clothes to a store like Buffalo Exchange, take that money and donate it to an organization that makes micro credit loans to people living in poverty to assist them in starting their own businesses? Not sure, but worth pondering....

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

One of those days that truly matters....

For Chris and me, the thousands of people serving juvenile life without parole sentences, and the tens of thousands of family members and concerned citizens that support them, June 25, 2012 will forever be remembered as the day the United States Supreme Court banned mandatory life in prison sentences for youth - or, perhaps more importantly, the day our hope was renewed.


Yesterday was made even more special because we reached our goal  - raising over $2000 to help the people affected by this ruling transition home from prison! Of course, with this ruling, the need is even greater. We are eternally indebted to everyone who donated and thereby made it easier for families to welcome their loved ones home. 



HUGE Thanks for:
Eric Hardin
Sarah McCall
Emily More
Kristin Hoddinott
Nicole Varma
Megan Caldwell
Arin Rollingher
Brian Weberg
MaryClare Peak & Dan Marlow
Casey Hughes
Kristin Wenstrom
Lauren Sanchez
Matt Wolf
Connie & Gregg Orians, as well as Belle, Cassius and Elbert
Cindy Wood
Carl Boand
Travis Massman
Nancy, Terry & Samantha Blankenship
Caitlin Boyce
Carrie Ann Alford
Ryan Basta
Daniel Gutman
Eliza Willamson
MaryJane Burch
Lou Szkatulski (in memory of her daughter Cherri Saltzman)
Nathan Peyer
Amy, Michael and Montgomery Sobol
Lauren Shapiro
Iva Blankenship
Sue Blankenship Boltz
Joanne Talarico
Betty and Bruce Hediger
The Pineda Family
Dan Nibler
Michaela Kovaks
Travis Martin


Because of this ruling, a good friend of Chris's and mine (who at 15 years  of age was sentenced  to life in prison with no hope of release) will now, at 63, finally be able to return to court and have his sentence reviewed. There are hundreds more people like this in Louisiana who for the first time in decades were able to get a good night's sleep knowing the highest court in the United States of America has finally heard their calls for help. Yesterday was one of those days that truly matter. 

My thoughts, positive energy, and encouraging vibes go out to all of the advocates in Louisiana and across the country who are acting upon this decision - there is a lot of work to be done. 

Thank you to everyone who has donated time and money to spread the word about this crisis.

To provide more in depth information on this ruling, we have provided the formal statement issued by the Equal Justice Initiative (Legal Representatives for Kuntrell Jackson and Evan Miller):

The U.S. Supreme Court today issued an historic ruling in Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs holding that mandatory life-without-parole sentences for all children 17 or younger convicted of homicide are unconstitutional. Kuntrell Jackson and Evan Miller, sentenced to life in prison without parole at 14, are now entitled to new sentencing hearings. Today’s ruling will affect hundreds of individuals whose sentences did not take their age or other mitigating factors into account.

The Court today struck down statutes in 29 states that provide for mandatory life-without-parole sentences for children, reasoning that mandatory imposition of life-without-parole sentences on children “contravenes Graham’s (and also Roper’s) foundational principle: that imposition of a State’s most severe penalties on juvenile offenders cannot proceed as though they were not children.”
"This is an important win for children. The Court took a significant step forward by recognizing the fundamental unfairness of mandatory death-in-prison sentences that don't allow sentencers to consider the unique status of children and their potential for change," said Bryan Stevenson, Executive Director of the Equal Justice Initiative, who represents Jackson and Miller. "The Court has recognized that children need additional attention and protection in the criminal justice system.”

Today’s decision requires the lower courts to conduct new sentencing hearings where judges will have to consider children’s individual characters and life circumstances, including age, as well as the circumstances of the crime.

While the Court did not categorically ban juvenile life without parole in all circumstances, Justice Kagan wrote for the majority that, “given all we have said in RoperGraham, and this decision about children’s diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change, we think appropriate occasions for sentencing juveniles to this harshest possible penalty will be uncommon.”

Stevenson cautioned, however, that sentencing courts’ discretion must be exercised in an informed and thoughtful way that acknowledges that children are biologically different than adults and less responsible for their wrongdoing, and that the courts should provide the individuals affected by the ruling a meaningful opportunity to show they have rehabilitated themselves and are appropriate candidates for release.

Stevenson added that historically, race and poverty have been powerful forces in influencing which children receive life-without-parole sentences.
Today's decision follows the Court's earlier rulings in Roper v. Simmons (2005) and Graham v. Florida (2010), which acknowledge the diminished culpability of children.

Groups as diverse as the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Psychiatric Association, the Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators, the American Bar Association, mental health professionals, former juvenile court judges, criminologists, victims, and national advocacy organizations filed amicus briefs in the cases to urge the Court to give children an opportunity to have their sentences reviewed later in life.